Describe the services currently delivered by this organisation Essay

Describe the services currently delivered by this organisation - Essay Example Police is inclusive of a wide range of activities, which ensure the lawful existence of citizens, without any discrepancies in the society due to negligence over unlawful occurrences. They include not only the activities related to safety and security, but also those related to improving the overall quality of life. Commercial Agents Unit: They provide licenses and authority to security officers and personnel to carry firearms and batons, to control situations that need immediate attention and swift action. This way, inflammatory situations are averted and controlled. However, it is not always that licenses are issued for these purposes. Only select applicants, matching the criterion required are provided with the equipment and the right to carry forward the application of those, in select circumstances. Community Diversity: A society that is pluralist and is a heterogeneous mixture of varied communities requires a strong security service, to recognise and upkeep the diversity. In providing this safety, it is imperative to avoid hurting the sentiments of certain groups. The Western Australia Police recognises this diversity and maintains this diversity, by providing equal protection for all and sundry, especially the senior citizens, without any form of discrimination or dilution of authority. Classifications: The Western Australia Police are classified under varied types to provide all-round services of protection and safety. Mounted Police, who are mounted on trained horses are one fo the fastest detectors and providers of security to the citizens. Next, the Air Wing Police operate via helicopters and aircrafts. They have two units and are extremely efficient operators of the Police Department. Further, the

The critical race theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The critical race theory - Essay Example However, white privilege is dissimilar from conditions of extreme vestiges of racism and/ or prejudice, whereupon the predominant race actively finds it rational to oppress other racial tribes for their own gain. Similarly, theories of white privilege stipulate that the whites perceive their social, economic and cultural knowledge as a custom that everyone should experience, as opposed to a merit that should be kept at the expense of others (5-9). This normative discernment unreservedly restrains the discourse of racial dissimilarity within the predominate discussion. Ideally, such interpretations are limited certain particulars which are detailed to downgraded racial groups. These disadvantaged groups are assumed as having failed to realize the norm. Ironically, the resort concentrates on what should be done with a view to helping those racial groups accomplish the normal principles experienced by whites (Stefanic 22-24). Stefani argues that the theories of privilege affirm discussi ons on racial dissimilarity do not genuinely discuss variations between Non-white and whites social status. Come to think of it, these theories only converse about the malfunction of non-white racial groups to accomplish normal white status. This supposition on the hand turns the subject of race into a problem which doesn’t involve white racial groups (12-14). Racialization of individuality and ethnic downgrading of blacks and the colored formed the basis for ideological slavery and subjugation. Whiteness satisfies the expansive ideas of property as illustrated by classical theorists. Granted, whiteness stipulated the legal position of a person as free or a slave. White individuality awarded corporeal and valuable privileges. Ownership of property included the privileges of use and enjoyment. If these privileges were essential characteristics of property, it was the individuality of whiteness that had to enjoy them. Whiteness was perceived as an aspect of individuality and pr operty significance because it is something that can be experienced and dispatched as a resource (Stefanic 133-137). The United States is the patron of race subornation. In this context, the dominion of legal associations, judicial explanation of racial individuality primed on the white supremacy replicate that race underestimation at the institutional level. By metamorphosizing white into whiteness, the law disguises the ideological aspect of racial interpretation. The overall assertion of theories of white privilege is that the lack of racial equality can’t be determined only by looking at the life circumstances of the underprivileged groups. In this context, they thus state that imperative solutions to the viable challenges of lack of racial equality can be accomplished by overtly talking about the inherent merits that whites as a privileged racial group uphold in the community (Stefanic 77-76). According to Stefanic in the period of nineteenth century, the retinues of whi te laborers, while they were reimbursed relatively minimal wages, were remunerated in general through a public and psychological wage. These white laborers were also accorded public distinction and titles of honor since they were simply white. They were acknowledged unquestionably well with all other groups of white people of to best public schools, public places, and or public functions. Some of them were recruited into the American police. Additionally, these groups of people were treated with laxity by the American courts with a view to encouraging lawlessness. Besides, they freely voted for American public officials (185-188). However, this had